Book Review: “The Language of God” by Francis Collins

Do science and faith conflict? Does being a scientist preclude being a believer? Can you be a Christian and a Darwinian evolutionist at the same time?

These are the questions Francis Collins, head of the Human Genome Project, seeks to answer in his book The Language of God.

The book starts with Collins’ personal testimony from atheism to belief (his testimony involves C.S. Lewis’s Mere Christianity and, more specifically, Lewis’s moral argument for God). In the second chapter, Collins addresses some common rationalist arguments against belief.

Having answered some fundamental objections, Collins jumps into his argument for the compatibility of science and faith. He begins with Big Bang cosmology, a hard science which (I feel) offers compelling evidence for the God of the Bible. Collins’ argument here is straightforward and rather common (among Bible-believing Big-Bang theorists). The Big Bang insists that the universe had a beginning and therefore it needs a beginner; the anthropic principle shows that the universe is finely-tuned as though it were built with man in mind.

So far, I’m in complete agreement with Collins. The moral argument for God is a good and rational argument. Science and faith are compatible. The Big Bang testifies loudly of the God of the Bible. The anthropic principle indicates the personal nature of the Creator.

And then Collins loses me.

Because what comes next is an argument for the compatibility of Darwinian evolution and historic Christianity.

In short order, Collins debunks the argument from design (er…tries his best to debunk), derides the “God of the gaps”, and discounts the Cambrian explosion as a challenge to Darwinian evolution. But really, Collins’ argument boils down to this statement he makes in the middle of chapter 4:

“No serious biologist today doubts the theory of evolution to explain the marvelous complexity and diversity of life. In fact, the relatedness of all species through the mechanism of evolution is such a profound foundation for the understanding of all biology that it is difficult to imagine how one would study life without it.”

Collins unpacks his support for Darwinian evolution as he explains the genome and his work on the Human Genome Project. Collins refers to DNA as “the language of God”–“the DNA language by which God spoke life into being.” Honestly? I can’t say I disagree with him on that point. DNA is a marvelous thing, and it is the language that “tells” living things to carry out the functions of living. But then Collins tells us that most of God’s language is gobbledy-gook. He makes his case for evolution based on the similarities between the DNA of all living things (and the ability to create a phylogenetic tree) and on the prevalence of so-called “junk DNA” (DNA that has no known function.)

The difficulty I have with the “junk DNA” argument, in particular, is that, after deriding a “God of the gaps”, Collins now finds it completely reasonable to introduce an “evolution of the gaps”. We don’t know of functions for this DNA so it must be junk–and therefore must have come about by evolution rather than design. The evidence suggests otherwise. Unfortunately, many scientists who hold to this belief have abandoned the search for function in the “junk DNA”–but those who have continued to study junk DNA have found that there’s much less “junk” than they originally thought.

Part 3 of The Language of God turns again to science/faith conflict. Collins issues a warning by hailing back to Galileo–reminding believers that their interpretations have been wrong before, and that holding too tightly to a wrong interpretation can result in damage to the faith. Now he moves on to what he considers to be the four options in dealing with science faith issues: atheism and agnosticism (where science trumps faith), creationism (where faith trumps science), intelligent design (when science needs divine help), and “Biologos” (where science and faith are in harmony). “BioLogos”, of course, means theistic evolution.

This section was a mixed bag. I agreed with Collins’ point in the chapter on atheism. Science can not be used to discount the existence of God, especially since science cannot account for morality. I agreed with many (but not all) of Collins’ arguments against intelligent design, especially his argument that intelligent design does not offer a predictive (that is, testable) scientific model.

But Collins’ chapter on creationism seems to me to be setting up a straw man of sorts by focusing on Young Earth creationism. It is true that to hold that the universe is less than 10,000 years old means discounting the evidences of multiple branches of science (geology and cosmology primary ones, but analysis of prolific Chinese genealogies also suggests that humanity itself is older than Ussher’s date for creation.) But does this mean that the Genesis accounts are not to be taken literally and that Darwinian evolution should be accepted?

I don’t believe so. Collins completely ignores what I feel to be the most Biblically- and scientifically-faithful alternative: old earth creationism, particularly the (non-Darwinian) creation model set forth by Reasons to Believe. Reasons to Believe has a high view of Scripture AND a high view of science, believing both to be books written by God to display Himself.

The difference between Collins’ approach and RTB’s is marked. Collins says “Since the common interpretation of science and the common interpretation of Scripture are incompatible, the interpretation of Scripture must be wrong.” Unfortunately, Collins does not offer any alternative exegesis in support of theistic evolution. On the other hand, Reasons to Believe says “Since the common interpretation of science and the common interpretation of Scripture are incompatible, we must examine both carefully to ascertain what God is really speaking through the two books of general and special revelation.” Reasons to Believe offers a legitimate alternative exegesis of Genesis 1-2, as well as other creation accounts in Scripture–and offers a legitimate scientific model that has explanatory power for the observations Collins sees as irrefutable proofs of evolution.

Ultimately, I think that Collins is well-meaning in his writing and is a sincere believer in God–but I think he has more in common with a liberal branch of theology that discounts Scripture as truly inerrant than with historic Christianity (which has upheld a high view of Scripture). He made arguments for evolution, sure, ones that different individuals may find more or less convincing (I am less convinced). He made arguments for faith from outside the realm of science. But despite stating that science and faith are compatible, Collins failed to make any good arguments for how science and faith are compatible.

I’m glad I read The Language of God, and I’m thankful to Janet for drawing my attention to this book. Clearly, though, I was unconvinced by Collins’ arguments for theistic evolution (what he calls “BioLogos”).


Rating:3 Stars
Category:Science and Religion
Synopsis:The head of the Human Genome Project attempts to make a case for the compatibility of Christianity and science, particularly Darwinian evolution.
Recommendation: A thought-provoking book, but ultimately unconvincing. I recommend it for critical readers, not so much for those who aren’t able or willing to think critically as they read.


WiW: Waiting

Waiting. It’s one of the most difficult tasks of my life.

For someone who hates to waste time, who wants to pack every moment full of something, waiting is terrible.

“I want to get on with my life,” I say.

I’m tired of waiting around for so and so to “talk it over”, for one or the other to “think about it.” I’m tired of waiting to get the okay from the higher ups, of waiting for the lower downs to catch up to where I’m at. I’m tired of waiting until I’m married, or until I have children, or until I own a house.

Waiting is hard.

But waiting isn’t wasted time.

“The active waiter finds purpose in every moment. She eagerly grabs hold of life and squeezes adventure and possibility out of each situation. Through the waiting, she develops an enviable trust in God. Psalm 37:3-7 describes the active waiter:

Trust in the Lord and do good [by reaching out to others];
Dwell in the land [make your home, settle down, be at peace where God puts you].
Delight yourself in the Lord [make the Lord your only joy], and he will give you the desires of your heart.
Commit your life [totally and unreservedly] to the Lord;
Trust in him and he will do this…
Be still before the Lord and
Wait patiently for him.

Trust, dwell, delight, commit, be still, and wait are all imperatives–they are not suggestions but commands. But of all the commands in Psalm 37, “wait patiently” is the most difficult. We can do this only if we have knelt at the altar of God’s timetable with open hands and an open heart and prayed:

‘But as for me, I trust in You, O Lord; I say “You are my God.” My times are in Your hand.’ (Psalm 31:14-15)”

~From Gift-Wrapped by God by Linda Dillow and Lorraine Pintus

Waiting has a purpose. Whatever its temporal purpose, it has a long-lasting purpose that far surpasses the momentary agony.

In it, I learn to trust in Christ. I learn to cling to Him. I learn to make Him my heart’s delight.

“Count it all joy, my brothers, when you meet trials of various kinds, for you know that the testing of your faith produces steadfastness. And let steadfastness have its full effect, that you may be perfect and complete, lacking in nothing.”
~James 1:2-4

Even if I die still waiting, my waiting will be worth it. For I will not die lacking. I will have Christ–and Him plus nothing equals everything.


The Week in WordsDon’t forget to take a look at Barbara H’s meme “The Week in Words”, where bloggers collect quotes they’ve read throughout the week.


Flashback: Fast Food

Prompt #9: “Did your family eat fast food often? What was you ‘go-to’ fast food restaurant? What was (is) your order at your favorite joint?”

My family didn’t eat fast food. Not much, anyway.

We ate fast food maybe once a month.

At first, it was “Sams”, a burger joint down the way that sold minimalistic hamburgers for some ridiculously low price. I don’t know, a quarter or fifty cents? All I know is Mom would spend ten bucks and feed the whole passel of us–and we were pretty big eaters (I’m talking multiple burgers per person for 6+ of us).

We always drove through at Sams, so I have no idea what the inside looked like.

We always went in to Taco Inn, on the other hand. Each of us kids got a 79 cent kids meal–a bean burrito, a small drink, and a cup of ice cream with sprinkles. And we had the chips and salsa that were available for free in the lobby. We got our money worth there, eating through tub after tub of chips. The burritos were delicious–but you had to kinda ignore the general unkemptness of the employees. Certainly, the cleanliness of their hair was less than awe-inspiring.

McDonald’s was anathema, and if we had to go to a chain burger joint, it was Burger King, where we could get Whopper Juniors. And that’s what we’d get. Whopper Juniors. Period. We didn’t get a lot of fancy side stuff. We got a sandwich, which we took home and ate with stuff of our own on the side.

The abuse we heaped on McDonald’s was over the top: They had cardboard sandwiches, they sprayed good smelling stuff on their food to make you think it was good. Okay, maybe that was the extent of the abuse.

We changed our tune (slightly) when two of my brothers started working at McDonalds. Then, it became a convenient place to spend nights with the kids after youth group. We’d take over a section of the dining room, piling it full of kids with their sodas or McFlurry’s. My brother came out and visited with the kids during his break–and after he handed the keys over to the next manager on duty. It wasn’t a bad way to spend a Wednesday night (I spent it there, even though I wasn’t in youth group, because I was a youth sponsor and because I love hanging out with my siblings, about half of whom were in youth group at that point.)

Which brings me, in roughly chronologic order, to today. Today when I had my first McChicken in a month.

When I started commuting back and forth between Columbus and Grand Island, I was working 12 hours days in GI. I didn’t have much option but to pick up fast food.

What I didn’t realize then was that going down to two eight hour days instead of one twelve wasn’t going to make it any easier to cook for myself once I got home.

I *always* eat lunch in my facilities as part of ensuring quality for our residents (the exception is when I foolishly space lunch because I’ve got my nose stuck in a chart). I get the last tray of the noon meal, generally around 12:30. Which means that if I leave GI around 4:30 (if I’m lucky-it’s usually closer to 5:30 or later), I’ll get back around six and be able to have supper at 6:30 at the earliest. Since the norm is leaving much later than the ideal, a long time passes between lunch and supper on days that I drive in to GI.

Which is all a justification for what has become a biweekly habit of mine-driving through McDonalds, where I get a McChicken and a Wild Berry Smoothie or a McChicken and a large Sprite, depending on how dehydrated I am.

Oh, and I occasionally throw in a small fry (although I always regret it since trans-fat-free frying oils have made all fried foods taste distinctly of rancidity) or an order of Cinnamon Bites.

Frankly? After a month off, I was glad to eat some “real” food on the way home–but McDonalds tasted pretty bleh. I think I should learn a lesson from my Fast Food Free February and stash oranges in my car to snack on during those drives home (at least, the ones that get started at a semi-decent hour!)


Flashback Prompt: Fast Food Order

I just completed an excruciating month without fast food. Fast Food Free February, I called it–a chance to give my wallet (and maybe my gut) a break. What I forgot was how hungry I get between lunch at my Grand Island facilities (around 12:30) and when I can fix myself something once I get home (I usually can’t get something made until at least seven). With that in mind (and the taste of Sprite still on my tongue), I’m ready to write about fast food:

“Did your family eat fast food often? What was you ‘go-to’ fast food restaurant? What was (is) your order at your favorite joint?”


Laura Ingalls Wilder Wrap-Up

Laura Ingalls Wilder Reading ChallengeI’ve been so busy blogging Cybils reviews this month, it seems I’ve completely ignored Barbara’s Laura Ingalls Wilder Reading Challenge.

But things aren’t always as they seem, and I’ve been having a blast immersing myself in The Little House in the Big Woods.

Re-reading Little House, I am struck again by how much I identified with Laura as a girl–and how much I still identify with her. On a superficial level, Laura is the second child and I’m the second child. She has brown hair–and so do I. Her older sister is blonde–so is mine. She’s a daddy’s girl–and so am I.

But two scenes are particularly poignant, then and now, reminding me of the ways Laura and I are alike.

When Laura and Mary went to town, Laura filled her pocket with the beautiful smooth stones she’d found by the shores of Lake Pepin. When Pa swung her into the wagon, her pocket, overtaxed with the burden Laura’s exuberant collecting had placed on it, tore right off her dress. Laura cried.

“Nothing like that ever happened to Mary. Mary was a good little girl who always kept her dress clean and neat and minded her manners. Mary had lovely golden curls, and her candy heart had a poem on it.

Mary looked very good and sweet, unrumpled and clean, sitting on the board beside Laura. Laura did not think it was fair.”

How many times have I found myself in a similar situation, I wonder? Wanting to grasp everything life has to offer, collecting experiences and projects and activities like a little girl collecting rocks, only to find out that I’ve overfilled my pockets and wrecked my dress. Then, of course, like Laura, I look with envy at the less ambitious of my siblings, the ones with intact dresses and only one hobby. I think it unfair that I am the way I am and they the way they are.

The second story also deals with sibling rivalry a bit. Laura slapped Mary one day, and Pa punished Laura with a whipping. Once the whipping was over, Laura sat in her chair and sulked. Laura writes: “The only thing in the whole world to be glad about was that Mary had to fill the chip pan all by herself.” Even after Pa mollified Laura’s feeling of inferiority about her (uglier than Mary’s?) hair, Laura is still glad that Mary had to gather all the chips.

That is me, all the way through to the core of original sin. Sulking when I’ve done wrong and gotten punished. Full of my own inferiority (or superiority, depending on the day). Spitefully glad when someone who hurt me (in however small a matter) has to pay.

It’s not a pretty sight, but it’s reality. Me, a full-grown woman, still often acting the part of a five-year-old girl.

Of course, Little House in the Big Woods did inspire more than just reflections on original sin–I also took the opportunity to do some Little House inspired activities.

I made butter and pancake men, rolled my hair in ragless rag curls, and sang “Old Grimes is Dead” (sung to the tune of “Auld Lang Syne”, of course).

You can browse through a full album of my LIW-inspired activities by clicking on the picture below link above.

[singlepic id=42 mode=web20|watermark]

And don’t forget to visit Barbara to see what everyone else has done this month.


Nightstand (February 2012)

I have finally managed to NOT almost forget a Nightstand–but I still almost missed it, thanks to whatever was going on with my database queries (still have no idea but crossing my fingers that my “fixes” will work).

But I didn’t forget it–or miss it. Instead, I’ve a whole huge collection of books to share from when I last updated you on my status (that is, since January 15).

This month I read:

Returned in last trip to library

Adult Fiction

  • The Help by Kathryn Stockett
    Single-handedly responsible for disrupting my sleep habits for a week. This was incredibly hard to put down.
  • The Peacemaker by Lori Copeland
    My little sis recommended this as a senseless read. She was right.

Adult Non-fiction

  • Arguing with Idiots by Glen Beck
    I think I’ve mentioned that I don’t think I’m a fan of Beck. But he does better at polemics (as in this book) than in trying to write socio-moral-political treatise (as in Glen Beck’s Commonsense).
  • Barack Obama: The Official Inaugural Book
    Even if I weren’t opposite Obama on the ideological spectrum, I think this book would still induce dry heaves. The contributors make absolute idiots of themselves, slobbering over the “legacy” of a man who had (by then) done precisely nothing. History will tell what Obama’s legacy will be–but whatever it is, this book will stand as a powerful testament to the ridiculousness of political idolatry.
  • The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks by Rebecca Skloot
    How do you describe this book? It’s the story of a line of cells (link to Wikipedia article) that has been in existence for over half a century. It’s the story of a writer trying to track down a story. It’s a story of medical ethics, of segregation, of identity. Mostly it’s a story about a woman who died and what is left living–her family and her cancerous cervical cells. Descriptions can’t do it justice–this is a true story told well.
  • The Only Wise God by William Lane Craig
    A rather dense but immensely interesting look at “middle knowledge”–an attempt to mesh the doctrines of God’s sovereignty and human freedom. Someday I’ll talk more about this, but I’m still playing it through in my brain. Most readers will probably prefer to hear about this rather than reading it–cause it’s kinda hard to read.

Some more completed books

Juvenile Fiction

  • Anne of Green Gables by L.M. Montgomery
  • Anne of Avonlea by L.M. Montgomery
    Both of the above were read for Carrie’s L.M. Montgomery Reading Challenge. I posted about my participation here
  • Blood Red Road by Moira Young
    Saba’s life is forever changed when four riders kill her father and kidnap her twin brother. Determined to find Lugh, Saba sets out an adventure that leads her through the desert, into cage-fighting, and straight to her heart’s desire. Blood Red Road is stunning, intense, and moving–and author Moira Young is poised to be the next epic fantasy author. (I was pleased that Blood Red Road won the Cybil Award for YA fantasy–I read this book as part of Amy’s Armchair Cybils.)
  • Breadcrumbs by Anne Ursu
    A middle-grade retelling of Andersen’s “The Snow Queen” with a dash of a dozen other fairy tales and fantasies thrown in. I loved this book. (Read as part of Amy’s Armchair Cybils. Title linked to my full review).
  • Chains by Laurie Halse Anderson
  • Forge by Laurie Halse Anderson
    The protagonists of Chains and Forge are young black slaves during the American Revolution-a unique enough concept in the first place. But what makes these novels great isn’t just the setting or the characters–it’s how the author captures the humanity of her characters within their setting. The reader can identify with the characters, but not (as usually is the case) because the characters have thoroughly modern sensibilities. Anderson draws her readers back into the internal conflict of fighting for freedom while keeping others enslaved.
  • The Friendship Doll by Kirby Larson
  • Level Up by Gene Luen Yang with art by Thien Pham
    The first graphic novel I’ve ever read–and I actually ended up enjoying it (a surprise for someone as text-bound as I). A story about video gaming, about med school, about living up to your parents’ expectations, about forging your own way, about guardian angels and exorcising your personal demons. I really was stunned by how much I enjoyed this book.
  • Like Pickle Juice on a Cookie by Julie Sternberg
  • Misfit by Jon Skovron
    I’m not one to dismiss whole classes of books with one fell swoop–and I’ve been reserving judgment regarding paranormal fiction (which for me means simply ignoring it). Misfit, about a half-girl/half-demon-child, has ended up being one of my first forays into the genre. So far, I’m not a fan. Not that the story wasn’t interesting–because it certainly was. But demons aren’t some imaginary entity that we can make out to be whatever we want them to be. They’re real. And this book does not portray them honestly. Instead, the demon-gods of the Old Testament become warring demon factions (some good, some evil) while the true God is completely ignored (except that the “newer” demons can be warded off by a crucifix.) In my mind, demons aren’t playthings–and neither is this book. (This was another Armchair Cybils read.)
  • 2 Easy Reading Cybils finalists
  • 2 Children’s Picture Book Cybils Finalists
  • 53 other Children’s picture books

Juvenile Non-Fiction

  • Amelia Lost: The Life and Disappearance of Amelia Earhart by Candace Fleming
    A glossy-paged, black-and-white-picture-filled, informative biography of Amelia Earhart. This book flips back and forth between the search for Amelia after her airplane was lost in the Pacific and the events of her life leading up to her global circumnavigation attempt. I was pleased that this nominee won the Cybil award for YA(?) nonfiction.
  • The Great Number Rumble by Cara Lee and Gillian O’Reilly
    A student narrates what happens when the principal decides to drop the math curriculum-and how one math-crazed student convinces him that he shouldn’t. This is a rather spectacular little book about some of the dozens of real-life math applications from music to Fibbonacci numbers to fractals to topology and cryptology and CG animation effects. I pretty much loved this little book–and think young readers (probably upper-elementary to middle-school students) just might like it too. Who ever knew math could be so cool?
  • Unraveling Freedom by Ann Bausum
    A very interesting look at how the fight for freedom abroad (in World War I) led to an erosion of freedom at home. I learned quite a bit of information I didn’t know–but I wasn’t altogether satisfied with how it was presented. It seemed a bit propaganda-ish to me.
  • 3 other books about math
  • 4 Cybils nonfiction picture book finalists

I just renewed a passel of books this last week–so my Nightstand is loaded with just under three weeks to go before I have to return them all.

Let the reading continue!

On my Nightstand now

Don’t forget to drop by 5 Minutes 4 Books to see what others are reading this month!

What's on Your Nightstand?


In which something happened

It came out of the blue, the announcement that our web hosting service would be suspending our account due to menterz.com “consuming excessive resources on our database servers.”

We had three days to fix the problem and no idea what the problem really was.

We still don’t know.

But three days have passed and they haven’t shut us down yet (although we shut ourselves down for a while to try to stall whatever was causing the drag on the database servers.)

I’ve been searching access logs, removing potentially problematic pages, and writing access rules to block bad bots.

And now we’re back online–sans some files that I still want to clean before I put them back on the web. So if you get a few more 404 error codes than you’re used to, I apologize.

Something happened.

I’m still not sure what.


Flashback: Encouraged Activities

Prompt #8: “Was your family musical, athletic, bookish? What sorts of activities were encouraged in your household?”

While some families are hard-core music people or hard-core athletes–and the children have little choice but to follow that same path, our family wasn’t/isn’t hard-core about anything but Christ.

Following Him was very much an encouraged activity. Everything else was extra.

Not that music wasn’t a part of our household–it definitely was. All of the kids but me took piano lessons and many of them got quite good. A handful of us serve on the worship teams at their respective churches (I am not one of that handful.)

Grace has taken music the farthest, I suppose, lettering umpteen-zillion times in band, show choir, and choir. But even her involvement is more circumspect than that of many youngsters. Until her senior year, she participated in only one group at a time–band first, then girls’ show choir, then finally deciding to do both girls’ show choir and regular choir together.

So music, I suppose we could be almost considered a musical family.

Sports? Not so much.

Joshua did football and track for a year. I think Timothy ran track for a year or two as well. Other than that? Zip, zilch, zero.

A number of the youngers (all those younger than me, actually) played church league softball during the summer, but that’s about the extent of our athletic involvement.

Books?

Even books are a tricky one. Certainly Mom was a reader (as seen last week). And Dad was an information-junkie.

But does that mean we’re all bookworms? No, not really.

Half of us are tried and true bookworms–a couple of us not so much.

So…what was encouraged in our household?

We were encouraged to be curious, to ask questions, to articulate answers. Sometimes that took the form of reading, sometimes of writing, sometimes just discussing the issues of the day.

This curiosity has held through into our adult lives, where some of us are writers, some of us are scientists, some of us are simply thinkers.

We were encouraged to serve, to find what needs to be done and to do it, to glorify God by serving His body and the lost.

This commitment to service has translated into our adult lives, where many of us our highly involved with our local churches and where many of our professions (whether medicine or military or manual work) focus on service.

And we were encouraged to walk in relationship with God through Jesus Christ.

We were Jesus people. Church people.

Not athletes, readers, or musicians.

Christians.

I am overjoyed when I see that my siblings have not left Christianity as a “childhood activity”, but have continued on in their walks with Christ.

So tell me, what kinds of activities were encouraged in your household?


Flashback Prompt: Family Activities

I probably gave away part of my answer in last week’s post–but I figured a continuation wouldn’t be bad. This week’s prompt asks about the sort of activities, “extra-curriculars” if you will, were big in your house growing up.

Was your family musical, athletic, bookish? What sorts of activities were encouraged in your household?

Of course, you’re more than welcome to talk about your children or now if you so choose.


Thankful Thursday: Family and Friends

Thankful Thursday bannerI seem to go through seasons where I spend a lot of time blogging, and other seasons where I spend a lot of time with people and have less time for blogging. This is good, I think.

This past week has been just packed with people–and I’m so thankful to God for placing me in and amongst such wonderful believers who regularly encourage me to walk worthy of the calling.

This week I’m thankful…

…to be able to support my friend Beth by watching the Flying Faithful play basketball

…for conversation and laughter on the dining room floor following a “trunk show”

…for pancake men and comfortable conversation with my sister

…for a newer friend and a couple old ones and supper in a rather sketch Mexican joint

…for a hastily assembled Sunday meal and conversation moving into the living room after lunch

…for FLOCK crashers and flock-belongers staying after to discuss and debate

…for long telephone conversations with my folks and encouragement to continue on

…for transparent testimony time with the girls who are praying for me and I for them.

And mostly, I’m thankful to the God who did not call me to a solitary existence, but into a body.